Liferation rates were seen in other tumor cell lines following LB1silencing, including MDAMB-35, MDA-MB-231, HCC 1937, HeLa and MCF 7 (Figure S1). The results obtained for all of the following experiments were similar for each of these cell lines; therefore we present only the data for U-2 OS cells.LB1 silencing causes cell cycle arrest in early GThe cessation of proliferation in U-2 OS cells silenced for LB1 expression (Fig. 1C) was attributable to G1 cell cycle arrest as determined by FACS. The latter data showed that ,87 of LB1 silenced cells were in G1 by day 3 following transfection with LB1 shRNA, compared to ,55 of control cells [n = 4; 15481974 p = 5.761023]. Furthermore, FACS analysis also revealed that DNA replication, as assayed by BrdU incorporation, could bedetected in only ,5 of LB1 silenced cells in contrast to ,28 of control cells [n = 3; p = 2.361023]. In order to analyze the G1 arrest in more detail, we carried out immunoblotting analyses of factors known to regulate progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle including p53, ATM, ATR, CHK1 and CHK2 (Fig. 2). We detected a significant increase in p53 levels in LB1 silenced cells (Fig. 2). In addition, we found that the level of ATR increased and that both ATR and its substrate CHK1 showed increased phosphorylation demonstrating their activation [27,28] (Fig. 2). Phosphorylation of ATM was not significantly altered and the phosphorylation of its downstream effector CHK2 could not be detected. Importantly, we also found that the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a key component of the DNA replication machinery which is normally synthesized at the end of G1 [29], was reduced to ,10 of controls (Fig. 2). Moreover, PCNA mRNA levels decreased to ,30 of controls as determined by qRT-PCR. Taken together, these results show that LB1 silenced cells are arrested in the early G1 phase of the cell cycle.Role of LB1 in NERSilencing of LB1 causes increased sensitivity to UV irradiationThe finding that the early G1 arrest induced by LB1 silencing was accompanied by the induction of p53 and activation of ATR (Fig. 2), suggested that DNA damage signaling or repair mechanisms might be defective [30]. However, we could not detect DNA damage Title Loaded From File within the nuclei of LB1 silenced cells using TUNEL [31], or by an increase in DNA damage foci as determined by indirect immunofluorescence staining with antibodies against phosphorylated replication protein A (pRPA32) [32,33] and cH2AX [34] (Figure S2). The ability of the silenced cells to repair DNA damage was further assessed by irradiating cells with 20 J/m2 UV at day 3 after LB1 silencing and measuring the number of Title Loaded From File apoptotic cells at time intervals following irradiation. Control and LB1 silenced cells showed a similar rate of apoptosis at 24 hr after irradiation (Fig. 3A). However, at 48 hr, LB1 silenced cells had a much greater percentage of apoptotic cells (,42 ) when compared to control cells (,18 ). By 80 hr, only small numbers of apoptotic cells could be detected in both LB1 silenced (,5 ) and control (,2 ) cells. Importantly, 48 hr after irradiation control cells recovered and re-entered the cell cycle with ,33 of cells in S phase, while the LB1 silenced cells that did not die by apoptosis remained arrested in G1 as determined by cell cycle analysis. The greater frequency of apoptosis after UV irradiation in LB1 silenced cells compared to controls, suggests that the UV induced DNA damage response and repair pathwa.Liferation rates were seen in other tumor cell lines following LB1silencing, including MDAMB-35, MDA-MB-231, HCC 1937, HeLa and MCF 7 (Figure S1). The results obtained for all of the following experiments were similar for each of these cell lines; therefore we present only the data for U-2 OS cells.LB1 silencing causes cell cycle arrest in early GThe cessation of proliferation in U-2 OS cells silenced for LB1 expression (Fig. 1C) was attributable to G1 cell cycle arrest as determined by FACS. The latter data showed that ,87 of LB1 silenced cells were in G1 by day 3 following transfection with LB1 shRNA, compared to ,55 of control cells [n = 4; 15481974 p = 5.761023]. Furthermore, FACS analysis also revealed that DNA replication, as assayed by BrdU incorporation, could bedetected in only ,5 of LB1 silenced cells in contrast to ,28 of control cells [n = 3; p = 2.361023]. In order to analyze the G1 arrest in more detail, we carried out immunoblotting analyses of factors known to regulate progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle including p53, ATM, ATR, CHK1 and CHK2 (Fig. 2). We detected a significant increase in p53 levels in LB1 silenced cells (Fig. 2). In addition, we found that the level of ATR increased and that both ATR and its substrate CHK1 showed increased phosphorylation demonstrating their activation [27,28] (Fig. 2). Phosphorylation of ATM was not significantly altered and the phosphorylation of its downstream effector CHK2 could not be detected. Importantly, we also found that the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a key component of the DNA replication machinery which is normally synthesized at the end of G1 [29], was reduced to ,10 of controls (Fig. 2). Moreover, PCNA mRNA levels decreased to ,30 of controls as determined by qRT-PCR. Taken together, these results show that LB1 silenced cells are arrested in the early G1 phase of the cell cycle.Role of LB1 in NERSilencing of LB1 causes increased sensitivity to UV irradiationThe finding that the early G1 arrest induced by LB1 silencing was accompanied by the induction of p53 and activation of ATR (Fig. 2), suggested that DNA damage signaling or repair mechanisms might be defective [30]. However, we could not detect DNA damage within the nuclei of LB1 silenced cells using TUNEL [31], or by an increase in DNA damage foci as determined by indirect immunofluorescence staining with antibodies against phosphorylated replication protein A (pRPA32) [32,33] and cH2AX [34] (Figure S2). The ability of the silenced cells to repair DNA damage was further assessed by irradiating cells with 20 J/m2 UV at day 3 after LB1 silencing and measuring the number of apoptotic cells at time intervals following irradiation. Control and LB1 silenced cells showed a similar rate of apoptosis at 24 hr after irradiation (Fig. 3A). However, at 48 hr, LB1 silenced cells had a much greater percentage of apoptotic cells (,42 ) when compared to control cells (,18 ). By 80 hr, only small numbers of apoptotic cells could be detected in both LB1 silenced (,5 ) and control (,2 ) cells. Importantly, 48 hr after irradiation control cells recovered and re-entered the cell cycle with ,33 of cells in S phase, while the LB1 silenced cells that did not die by apoptosis remained arrested in G1 as determined by cell cycle analysis. The greater frequency of apoptosis after UV irradiation in LB1 silenced cells compared to controls, suggests that the UV induced DNA damage response and repair pathwa.