Ght into the protein structure-spectra relationship. Certainly doing this analysis we should keep in mind the semiempirical nature of the CD calculations and semi-quantitative agreement to the experiment Several one-electron mixings and coupled oscillator interactions (nine in total) were analyzed in terms of changes of the interaction energies and the distances between the chromophores (Table 2). Three combinations of couplings between the PF-00299804 chemical information near-UV CD transitions (Lb-Lb; Lb-La and La-La) of the same chromophore couple (W5 and W16) were analyzed. The average distance between the two tryptophans in the calculated MD snapshots is ??6.8 A, which is longer by 1.4 A than the same distance in the crystal structure (Table 2). The averaged interaction energies (in absolute values) of the three combinations of coupling interactions (Lb-Lb, Lb-La and La-La) differ dramatically from that in the crystal structure, i.e. i) for the Lb-Lb coupling in the crystal structure the interaction energy is 0.32 cm21 whilst in the MD snapshots the averaged value is 10.66 cm21; ii) for the Lb-La coupling the values are 39.77 cm21 (crystal structure) and 18.25 cm21(averaged from the MD snapshots); and iii) for the La-La coupling the values are 67.04 cm21 (crystal structure ) and 25.72 cm21(MD averaged) (Table 2). In both sets of calculations the order of increasing interaction energies is as follows: Lb-Lb RLb-La RLa-La, however, in the MD-based calculations the differences between the values for the three couplings are much smaller to each other. The absolute values of the interaction energies in the three cases Table 2. Interactions between chromophores in terms of distances and net interaction energies in the crystal structures and as averaged from the MD trajectory in the wild type HCAII.?Distance (A) Crystal Structure LbW5-LbW16 LbW5-LaW16 LaW5-LaW16 LaW97-LaW245 LaW192-LaW209 CPI-203 web LaY194-LaW209 LaY88-LaY128 Lb-LaW123 Lb-LaW209 5.4 5.4 5.4 8.0 10.4 3.9 7.8 ??MD 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.7 11.1 4.7 8.0 ??Energy (cm21) Crystal Structure 0.32 39.77 67.04 7.80 12.27 93.07 9.65 993.97 460.83 MD 10.66 18.25 25.72 6.72 10.27 36.33 11.15 604.59 175.Interactiondoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056874.tdemonstrate a general trend of decreasing with the distance, however, 15857111 this trend has specific form for each combination of transitions (Figure S4 in Supporting Information S1). As far as the distances and orientations are changed in the same manner, these differences would suggest that the structural fluctuations have slightly differential effect on each of the three combinations of transition interactions (between the same chromophores). The electric dipole moments of the Lb and La 1317923 transitions have different orientations within the indole ring, and nevertheless the distance is the same, the angles between the transition moment vectors are different and lead to different interaction energies. Most importantly, the three types couplings within the same chromophore couple: Lb-Lb, Lb-La and La-La reflect to a different extend the fluctuation and relaxation of the external protein asymmetric field. There are two clusters of distances between W5 and W16, ??found in the calculated snapshots: 4? A and 7?0 A, which ?demonstrate that the crystal structure alone (with distance 5.4 A) is not fully representative for the geometric parameters of this coupled oscillator interaction under physiological conditions. The coupling between La transitions of W97 and W245, as well as that between La transitions of W1.Ght into the protein structure-spectra relationship. Certainly doing this analysis we should keep in mind the semiempirical nature of the CD calculations and semi-quantitative agreement to the experiment Several one-electron mixings and coupled oscillator interactions (nine in total) were analyzed in terms of changes of the interaction energies and the distances between the chromophores (Table 2). Three combinations of couplings between the near-UV CD transitions (Lb-Lb; Lb-La and La-La) of the same chromophore couple (W5 and W16) were analyzed. The average distance between the two tryptophans in the calculated MD snapshots is ??6.8 A, which is longer by 1.4 A than the same distance in the crystal structure (Table 2). The averaged interaction energies (in absolute values) of the three combinations of coupling interactions (Lb-Lb, Lb-La and La-La) differ dramatically from that in the crystal structure, i.e. i) for the Lb-Lb coupling in the crystal structure the interaction energy is 0.32 cm21 whilst in the MD snapshots the averaged value is 10.66 cm21; ii) for the Lb-La coupling the values are 39.77 cm21 (crystal structure) and 18.25 cm21(averaged from the MD snapshots); and iii) for the La-La coupling the values are 67.04 cm21 (crystal structure ) and 25.72 cm21(MD averaged) (Table 2). In both sets of calculations the order of increasing interaction energies is as follows: Lb-Lb RLb-La RLa-La, however, in the MD-based calculations the differences between the values for the three couplings are much smaller to each other. The absolute values of the interaction energies in the three cases Table 2. Interactions between chromophores in terms of distances and net interaction energies in the crystal structures and as averaged from the MD trajectory in the wild type HCAII.?Distance (A) Crystal Structure LbW5-LbW16 LbW5-LaW16 LaW5-LaW16 LaW97-LaW245 LaW192-LaW209 LaY194-LaW209 LaY88-LaY128 Lb-LaW123 Lb-LaW209 5.4 5.4 5.4 8.0 10.4 3.9 7.8 ??MD 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.7 11.1 4.7 8.0 ??Energy (cm21) Crystal Structure 0.32 39.77 67.04 7.80 12.27 93.07 9.65 993.97 460.83 MD 10.66 18.25 25.72 6.72 10.27 36.33 11.15 604.59 175.Interactiondoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056874.tdemonstrate a general trend of decreasing with the distance, however, 15857111 this trend has specific form for each combination of transitions (Figure S4 in Supporting Information S1). As far as the distances and orientations are changed in the same manner, these differences would suggest that the structural fluctuations have slightly differential effect on each of the three combinations of transition interactions (between the same chromophores). The electric dipole moments of the Lb and La 1317923 transitions have different orientations within the indole ring, and nevertheless the distance is the same, the angles between the transition moment vectors are different and lead to different interaction energies. Most importantly, the three types couplings within the same chromophore couple: Lb-Lb, Lb-La and La-La reflect to a different extend the fluctuation and relaxation of the external protein asymmetric field. There are two clusters of distances between W5 and W16, ??found in the calculated snapshots: 4? A and 7?0 A, which ?demonstrate that the crystal structure alone (with distance 5.4 A) is not fully representative for the geometric parameters of this coupled oscillator interaction under physiological conditions. The coupling between La transitions of W97 and W245, as well as that between La transitions of W1.