Eedat, Stein, Carey, 2005).Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptIPV and Psychological TraumaIPV commonly results in psychological trauma, defined as the appraisal of threat to bodily integrity or sanity which overwhelms an individual’s ability cope and thus to integrate their emotional experience (Allen, 2005; Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995, Saakvitne, Gamble, Pearlman, Tabor Lev, 2000). Traumatization includes psychological (APA, 2013; Rothschild, 2000; Siegel, 2003) and neurophysiological processes, including changes to the central, autonomic, and neuroendocrine systems integral to regulating arousal (Yehuda LeDoux, 2007; Sherin Nemeroff, 2011). From a psychological perspective, trauma entails loss and alterations to one’s sense of self-efficacy, way of life, and relationships. This often results in feelings of fear and grief which become inseparable from memories of the traumatic event (Iverson, et al., 2013; Titchener, 1986). Mental health outcomes associated with traumatic experiences like IPV can range across the diagnostic span, including major depressive disorder, substance use disorders, anxiety disorders, and PTSD (Follette, Palm, Rasmussen Hall, 2004). Individuals who have faced repeated IPV, emotional abuse, and neglect from PD150606 manufacturer childhood onward often have the most severe psychological symptoms (Allen, 2013; Allen, Coyne, Huntoon, 1998; Iverson, et al., 2013). Additionally, IPV can have a profound effect on Losmapimod web relational capacity, profoundly affecting the attachment style of adult survivors (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978; Allen, 2013). According to attachment theory, secure attachments help individuals regulate emotional distress, whereas insecure attachments render people susceptible to affective dysregulation (Mikulincer Shaver, 2008). Building on the work of Bowlby (1958, 1988), Ainsworth and colleagues described two primary insecure attachment styles as avoidant/dismissive and anxious/resistant (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978). Individuals who develop an avoidant attachment style exhibit outwardly compliant, polite, and submissive behavior towards significant others that masks their internally dysregulated emotional state. InJ Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Kelly and GarlandPagecontrast, individuals who develop an anxious attachment style exhibit relational ambivalence, vacillating between attempts to draw in significant others with endearing attention-seeking behaviors and attempts to attract attention through emotional outbursts of crying or anger. Exposure to traumatic incidents, such as IPV, in childhood or adulthood can disrupt attachments and lead to insecure attachment styles (Allen, 2005, 2013). For survivors of IPV with anxious attachment styles, emotional distress is often experienced as intolerable, resulting in desperate attempts to obtain security from adult attachment figures (e.g., romantic partner or close friend), typically in off-putting ways that actually undercut the emotional needs of the survivor. IPV survivors with avoidant attachment styles may attempt to suppress their negative emotions, which later erupt explosively as a result of intensified autonomic arousal (Gross, 2002) and the post-suppression rebound effect (Wetzlaff Wegner, 2000). The disrupted attachments, tremendous losses, absence of control, violations of safety, and betrayal of trust experienced by survivors of recurrent IPV can impede quality.Eedat, Stein, Carey, 2005).Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptIPV and Psychological TraumaIPV commonly results in psychological trauma, defined as the appraisal of threat to bodily integrity or sanity which overwhelms an individual’s ability cope and thus to integrate their emotional experience (Allen, 2005; Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995, Saakvitne, Gamble, Pearlman, Tabor Lev, 2000). Traumatization includes psychological (APA, 2013; Rothschild, 2000; Siegel, 2003) and neurophysiological processes, including changes to the central, autonomic, and neuroendocrine systems integral to regulating arousal (Yehuda LeDoux, 2007; Sherin Nemeroff, 2011). From a psychological perspective, trauma entails loss and alterations to one’s sense of self-efficacy, way of life, and relationships. This often results in feelings of fear and grief which become inseparable from memories of the traumatic event (Iverson, et al., 2013; Titchener, 1986). Mental health outcomes associated with traumatic experiences like IPV can range across the diagnostic span, including major depressive disorder, substance use disorders, anxiety disorders, and PTSD (Follette, Palm, Rasmussen Hall, 2004). Individuals who have faced repeated IPV, emotional abuse, and neglect from childhood onward often have the most severe psychological symptoms (Allen, 2013; Allen, Coyne, Huntoon, 1998; Iverson, et al., 2013). Additionally, IPV can have a profound effect on relational capacity, profoundly affecting the attachment style of adult survivors (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978; Allen, 2013). According to attachment theory, secure attachments help individuals regulate emotional distress, whereas insecure attachments render people susceptible to affective dysregulation (Mikulincer Shaver, 2008). Building on the work of Bowlby (1958, 1988), Ainsworth and colleagues described two primary insecure attachment styles as avoidant/dismissive and anxious/resistant (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978). Individuals who develop an avoidant attachment style exhibit outwardly compliant, polite, and submissive behavior towards significant others that masks their internally dysregulated emotional state. InJ Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Kelly and GarlandPagecontrast, individuals who develop an anxious attachment style exhibit relational ambivalence, vacillating between attempts to draw in significant others with endearing attention-seeking behaviors and attempts to attract attention through emotional outbursts of crying or anger. Exposure to traumatic incidents, such as IPV, in childhood or adulthood can disrupt attachments and lead to insecure attachment styles (Allen, 2005, 2013). For survivors of IPV with anxious attachment styles, emotional distress is often experienced as intolerable, resulting in desperate attempts to obtain security from adult attachment figures (e.g., romantic partner or close friend), typically in off-putting ways that actually undercut the emotional needs of the survivor. IPV survivors with avoidant attachment styles may attempt to suppress their negative emotions, which later erupt explosively as a result of intensified autonomic arousal (Gross, 2002) and the post-suppression rebound effect (Wetzlaff Wegner, 2000). The disrupted attachments, tremendous losses, absence of control, violations of safety, and betrayal of trust experienced by survivors of recurrent IPV can impede quality.