Mmunities where investigations and removal from the home are common; these effects may include increased victimization and behavioral problems in youth throughout the neighborhood (Roberts, 2008). In order to both decrease victimization rates and improve functioning of families, it may be necessary to research potential community-level interventions and services. Additional research is needed to further understand the receipt of services in kinship foster families in terms of both financial assistance and purchase Pan-RAS-IN-1 caseworker monitoring and supervision. Youth may benefit from kinship foster settings when caregivers have sufficient support and Oxaliplatin site ability to provide the consistency needed for child well-being. Studies may evaluate outcomes of those homes and families who do receive benefits through either the foster care system or other forms of cash assistance, as well as striving to identify not just who is receiving these services, but what barriers caregivers face that may prevent receipt. A better understanding of families’ connections to child welfare caseworkers may also identify potential opportunities to improve services. It may be that caseworkers who have greater contact and interaction with families may mitigate the effects associated with caregiver aging and health problems. Additionally, community-level supports and services for neighborhoods with a high concentration of child welfare involvement may be beneficial in improving youth outcomes and family functioning. Taken together, these evaluations may be important indicators to effect policy change in regards to standards and requirements of child welfare services and caseworkers. Limitations The present study is not without limitations to be considered. The sample size was relatively small despite using a national probability sample. Studies with larger samples of African American families may be used to replicate findings. The use of nationally representative data in this study facilitates comparisons with future samples. Another limitation of note is many of the variables used were solely caregiver-reported. Other than derived variables (which pulled data from multiple sources) and some demographics, caregivers reported the outcome variables, environment, and caregiver health. Thus, findings mainly reflect the perceptions and experiences of the caregivers, and do not directly capture experiences of the youth in the study. Relatedly, different caregivers reported on child mental health at different time points for many youth. Although prior research has found stability across reporters and over time for children in child welfare (Glisson, Hemmelgarn, Post, 2002), variation may have been introduced in assessing change in mental health over time. A strength of the present study is the longitudinal design. Although the timeframe is not very long, this allows the focus on change in internalizing and externalizing behaviors over time. Given that approximately half of the sample under study had a change in their living environment between baseline and follow-up it is important to focus on the effects ofAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Soc Serv Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 25.Rufa and FowlerPageplacement and contextual factors since baseline. No main effect on mental health existed in this study of moving or staying; however, it is possible that there is a great deal of withingroup variation. Some youth may have changed plac.Mmunities where investigations and removal from the home are common; these effects may include increased victimization and behavioral problems in youth throughout the neighborhood (Roberts, 2008). In order to both decrease victimization rates and improve functioning of families, it may be necessary to research potential community-level interventions and services. Additional research is needed to further understand the receipt of services in kinship foster families in terms of both financial assistance and caseworker monitoring and supervision. Youth may benefit from kinship foster settings when caregivers have sufficient support and ability to provide the consistency needed for child well-being. Studies may evaluate outcomes of those homes and families who do receive benefits through either the foster care system or other forms of cash assistance, as well as striving to identify not just who is receiving these services, but what barriers caregivers face that may prevent receipt. A better understanding of families’ connections to child welfare caseworkers may also identify potential opportunities to improve services. It may be that caseworkers who have greater contact and interaction with families may mitigate the effects associated with caregiver aging and health problems. Additionally, community-level supports and services for neighborhoods with a high concentration of child welfare involvement may be beneficial in improving youth outcomes and family functioning. Taken together, these evaluations may be important indicators to effect policy change in regards to standards and requirements of child welfare services and caseworkers. Limitations The present study is not without limitations to be considered. The sample size was relatively small despite using a national probability sample. Studies with larger samples of African American families may be used to replicate findings. The use of nationally representative data in this study facilitates comparisons with future samples. Another limitation of note is many of the variables used were solely caregiver-reported. Other than derived variables (which pulled data from multiple sources) and some demographics, caregivers reported the outcome variables, environment, and caregiver health. Thus, findings mainly reflect the perceptions and experiences of the caregivers, and do not directly capture experiences of the youth in the study. Relatedly, different caregivers reported on child mental health at different time points for many youth. Although prior research has found stability across reporters and over time for children in child welfare (Glisson, Hemmelgarn, Post, 2002), variation may have been introduced in assessing change in mental health over time. A strength of the present study is the longitudinal design. Although the timeframe is not very long, this allows the focus on change in internalizing and externalizing behaviors over time. Given that approximately half of the sample under study had a change in their living environment between baseline and follow-up it is important to focus on the effects ofAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Soc Serv Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 25.Rufa and FowlerPageplacement and contextual factors since baseline. No main effect on mental health existed in this study of moving or staying; however, it is possible that there is a great deal of withingroup variation. Some youth may have changed plac.