/width at posterior margin: 1.7?.9. Mediotergite 1 shape: slightly widening from anterior margin to 0.7?.8 mediotergite length (where maximum width is reached), then narrowing towards posterior margin. Mediotergite 1 sculpture: with some sculpture near lateral margins and/or posterior 0.2?.4 of mediotergite. Mediotergite 2 width at posterior margin/length: 4.0?.3. Mediotergite 2 sculpture: mostly smooth. Outer margin of hypopygium:Review of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)…with a wide, medially folded, transparent, semi esclerotized area; usually with 4 or more pleats (?). Ovipositor thickness: anterior width 3.0?.0 ?posterior width (beyond ovipositor constriction) (?). Ovipositor sheaths length/metatibial length: 0.6?.7. Length of fore wing veins r/2RS: 1.7?.9. Length of fore wing veins 2RS/2M: 1.1?.3. Length of fore wing veins 2M/(RS+M)b: 0.7?.8. Pterostigma length/width: 3.1?.5. Point of insertion of vein r in pterostigma: about half way point length of pterostigma. Angle of vein r with fore wing anterior margin: clearly inwards, inclined towards fore wing base. Shape of junction of veins r and 2RS in fore wing: distinctly but not strongly angled. Sinensetin web molecular data. No molecular data available for this species. Biology/ecology. Gregarious. Hosts: Hesperiidae, I-BRD9 solubility Urbanus proteus (of specimens identified as this species in United States, FL). Distribution. Cuba, Grenada, Puerto Rico, St. Vincent, United States (FL). There is no suggestion that this species occurs in ACG or Costa Rica. Comments. The holotype is missing the antennae, one forewing and some legs ut it is possible to see a full set of legs, except for the sole hind leg remaining where some tarsal segments are missing. The name A. leucostigmus was applied by Smith et al. (2008) to a complex of around 40 species reared from hesperiids in ACG. At that time it was thought that one of those species might correspond to the actual A. leucostigmus. After examining the holotype of A. leucostigmus, it is clear, however, that none of the ACG species correspond to it. However, all are related and belong to the same speciesgroup. Thus, the name of A. leucostigmus, as used as the base for an interim name in Smith et al. (2008), should be considered as a misidentification, as well as was the case when applied to members of this group before it was realized that it is a speciose group composed of morphologically similar species. We examined a specimen from Peru, deposited in the CNC and labelled as “A. leucostigmus”, and believe is not that species either, but just another member of the leucostigmus group. Apanteles lilliammenae Fern dez-Triana, sp. n. http://zoobank.org/E479CB5B-6058-47F3-9CE0-305E423B7C55 http://species-id.net/wiki/Apanteles_lilliammenae Figs 189, 318 Apanteles Rodriguez64 (Smith et al. 2006). Interim name provided by the authors. Type locality. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector Horizontes, Vado Esteron, 95m, 10.76271, -85.56004. Holotype. in CNC. Specimen labels: 1. DHJPAR0001675. 2. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector Horizontes, Vado Esteron, 03.ix.1996, 95m, 10.76271, -85.56004, DHJPAR0001675.<