Systematic OR spatial OR quantitative OR metapopulation) AND `conservation planning’) OR `reserve internet site selection’ OR `connectivity conservation’ OR (conservation AND (`spatial optimization’ OR `spatial optimisation’)) OR `conservation prioritisation’ OR `conservation area prioritisation’ 
OR `conservation area selection’ OR `protected region network’ OR `conservation resource allocation’ OR `conservation choice analysis’]. Search results were downloaded in the Net of Science, and PDFs of publicationsIII. Outcomes(1) Occurrence of terms within the literature Figures 1 and two summarise publication volume across years, publication venues, and countries of origin of analysis. Most of the literature inside the field of SCP and spatial conservation prioritisation in the broad sense is comparatively recent overBiological Reviews 88 (2013) 44364 2012 The Authors. Biological Reviews 2012 Cambridge Philosophical SocietyConcepts of systematic conservation planningPeoples Republic of China 2.3 France three.2 Italy 3.three Brazil three.four Germany 3.9 Spain 4.1 USA 41 Netherlands 2 Ribocil manufacturer Denmark 1.9 India 1.9447 and objective occurred quite regularly (in approximately 400 of all publications), implying that the targetoriented model of specifying objectives and trying to satisfy them effectively has been extensively adopted (Nicholson Possingham, 2006; Carwardine et al., 2009; Moilanen Arponen, 2011). The statistics provided in Table 1 could be applied to supply an overview with the use of terminology in SCP, for identifying study trends, and for identifying informative important words for literature searches. Understanding the frequency from the use of a term might PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338381 help in the preparing of literature searches; an extremely frequently occurring term is on its own as well unspecific whilst a really infrequently occurring phrase may fail sufficiently to determine relevant literature. We also found that accomplishment in searches for terms was very variable from post titles and abstracts or from inside the article text: some terms happen predominantly within the body text of an write-up and may therefore only be located using a full-text PDF search (Table 1). (2) Adequacy Adequacy currently was observed as an important idea in reserve design and style and nature conservation by the 1990s. It may be defined as `the upkeep from the ecological viability and integrity of populations, species and communities’ (Commonwealth of Australia, 1992, glossary, iii) or `as the extent to which reserves fulfil their simple purpose of conserving biodiversity.’ (Lunney et al., 1997, p. 138). Persistence is frequently mentioned as underlying adequacy (Cowling Pressey, 2001; Pressey Logan, 1998; Williams Araujo, 2000; Desmet Cowling, 2004; Wilson et al., 2009; Linke et al., 2011). The concept of adequacy and species persistence goes back to studies of your species-area partnership, colonisation and extinction theories, and island biogeography theory in the 1960970s. A cornerstone of this investigation is MacArthur Wilson’s (1963) study on immigration and extinction curves. Island biogeography theory influenced conservation by means of discussions about how the size and other functions of conservation locations (or `islands’) influence the persistence of species (Diamond, 1975; Simberloff Abele, 1976; Margules, Higgs Rafe, 1982). Through the 1970980s the value of area size and shape, extinction and colonisation rates, and species-area relationships were substantially discussed in the viewpoint of how they really should influence the design of adequate single reserve.