S inside the TLC transcripts had been generally important (uncorrected and ungrammatical) and under no circumstances minor (corrected and Mirin consistent using the syntactic class regularity). The imply variety of important CC violations was 2.22 per response for H.M. versus 0.13 for the controls (SD = 0.20), a trustworthy 10.43 SD distinction. four.two.1.two. Major Omission-Type CC Violations Table 4 provides a full list of key omission-type CC violations for H.M. as well as the controls in Study two, classified by the syntactic category on the units involved. H.M. created 0.50 omission-type CC violations per response, versus a imply of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.ten), a trusted 4.90 SD difference. four.two.1.three. Main Commission-Type CC Violations Table five gives a complete list of major commission-type CC violations for H.M. along with the controls, classified by syntactic category in the units involved. H.M. developed 1.35 commission-type CC violations per response versus a imply of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.04), a trustworthy 33.50 SD deficit.Brain Sci. 2013, three Table four. Key omission-type violations of conjunction constraints (CCs) involving determiners, nouns, noun phrases (NPs), and verb modifiers in Study two organized by sort of constraint.Main Violations of Determiner-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Is it crowded and it just pointed out this bus is up right here and it’s crowded school bus.” (BPC: a crowded college bus) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a to the NP a crowded college bus] H.M.: “If they don’t use legs like he does … and his hands, they could fall.” (determiner BPC: use their legs) [H.M. failed to conjoin the pronominal determiner their towards the NP their legs] H.M.: “it’s on popular street…” (determiner BPC: on a prevalent street) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a towards the NP a widespread street] H.M.: “Well he’s placing the price tag of it and price of issue what it is…” (determiner BPC: and also the price of X (this) factor) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner the for the NP the price] H.M.: “David wanted him to fall and to find out what lady’s using to pull himself up besides his hands.” (determiner BPC: to determine what this lady’s working with) [H.M. failed to conjoin the demonstrative determiner this towards the NP this lady] Control participant: “Salesman’s talking to…” (BPC: a or the salesman’s speaking to) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner to the NP a or the salesman] H.M.: “I want a few of that pie 
either some pie and I will have some.” (BPC: and I’ll have some X (cake)) [H.M. failed to conjoin the noun cake for the determiner some inside the NP some cake] Handle participant: “Woman’s telling the baker…” PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338362 (BPC: a or this woman’s telling…) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner for the NP a or the woman] Important Violations of Verb-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Well you–she desires a single point and he wants a different point plus the fresh are not–are not. Does not say that, it says not.” (BPC: the fresh fruit are usually not) H.M.: “He had this (inaudible) … no, she’s taking that suit and he desires to take it … and he’s trying to sell.” (BPC: attempting to sell it or that suit) [H.M. failed to conjoin an object to a VP including sell it or sell that suit] Control participant: “This person is displaying the lady who’s gonna sit.” (BPC: this person is showing the sign for the lady who’s gonna sit) [This participant failed to conjoin an object to the VP is showing in addition to a preposition for the lady] Big Violations of Preposition-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Before at first you cross across.” (BPC: you.