Cted for each animal. Confocal fluorescence images were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoview FV10i system, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). In each section of the sciatic nerve, a fluorescence image (2006200 mm) was captured in the area approximately 500 mm distant from theIba1+ and GFP+ Cells in the Injured Sciatic Nerve in BM Chimeric miceOur preliminary data using GFP+ BM chimeric mice showed that peripheral nerve injury induced infiltration of GFP+ BMderived cells in the ipsilateral peripheral nerve, which gradually increased between Day 3 and 14. On Day 14, the infiltration of GFP+ BM-derived cells was maximal, and approximately half of them were Iba1+ macrophages. In this study, we identified Iba1+ and GFP+ cells in the injured sciatic nerve 14 days after pSNL surgery in TRPM2BM+/Rec+, TRPM2BM?Rec+, TRPM2BM+/Rec?TRPM2 in Spinal Infiltration of Macrophage in PainFigure 3. Infiltration of GFP+ BM-derived cells around the injured sciatic nerve in WT/TRPM2-KO BM chimeric mice. (A) GFP+ cells and Iba1+ cells were visualized by GFP fluorescence (green) and immunostaining with Iba1 antibody (red), respectively, in the sciatic nerve sections around the ligation site 14 days after pSNL surgery. Iba1+/GFP+ cells were visualized as a yellow signal in merged images. Representative microphotographs are shown (scale bars = 50 mm). (B) The numbers of Iba12/GFP+ cells, Iba1+/GFP2cells, and Iba1+/GFP+ cells within the images were counted in the contralateral (left panel) and ipsilateral (right panel) sections. n = 3?. Data are expressed as the mean 6 SEM. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066410.gTRPM2BM?Rec?mice (Fig. 3, Table 1). Small numbers of Iba1+ cells and GFP+ cells were observed in the contralateral sciatic nerve in all chimeric mice. Some GFP+ cells were double positive for Iba1. No differences were observed in the number of Iba1+ cells (F3,10 = 0.22, p = 0.881) and GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.20, p = 0.896) among chimera groups. Merged images revealed no difference in the number of Iba1?GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.31, p = 0.816) or Iba1+/GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.33, p = 0.806) among chimera groups. Few Iba1+/GFP?cells were observed in any of the chimera groups, and no difference was observed among chimera Title Loaded From File groups (F3,10 = 0.35, p = 0.790). In the ipsilateral sciatic nerve, Iba1+ cells and GFP+ cells were dramatically increased, and 50?5 of GFP+ cells were positive for Iba1. Although the number of GFP+ cells Title Loaded From File tended to increase inTRPM2BM+/Rec?mice and decrease in TRPM2BM?Rec?mice, no significant differences were observed in the numbers of Iba1+ cells (F3,10 = 0.48, p = 0.706) and GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 2.93, p = 0.086) among chimera groups. Furthermore, merged photographs revealed no differences in the numbers of Iba1?GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 1.43, p = 0.292) or Iba1+/GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.53, p = 0.670) among chimera groups. The number of Iba1+/GFP?cells was low in all chimera groups, and no difference was observed among chimera groups (F3,10 = 2.21, p = 0.150).TRPM2 in Spinal Infiltration of Macrophage in PainTable 1. The numbers of Iba1+ and GFP+ cells around the injured sciatic nerve.Contralateral TRPM2 Total cells Iba1 cells 23977191 GFP+ cells Iba1?GFP+ cells Iba1+/GFP?cells Iba1+/GFP+ cells+ BM+/Rec+Ipsilateral TRPMBM?Rec+TRPMBM+/Rec?TRPMBM?Rec?TRPM2BM+/Rec+ TRPM2BM?Rec+ TRPM2BM+/Rec?TRPM2BM?Rec?24.7 6 7.3 18.7 6 7.3 18.7 6 4.3 6.0 6 2.0 6.0 6 3.2 12.7 6 4.1 25.0 6 0.6 15.7 6 3.7 23.3 6 1.8 9.3 6 3.7 1.7 6 1.7 14.0 6 2.0 32.0 6 4.6 17.0 6 6.1 32.0 6 4.6.Cted for each animal. Confocal fluorescence images were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoview FV10i system, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). In each section of the sciatic nerve, a fluorescence image (2006200 mm) was captured in the area approximately 500 mm distant from theIba1+ and GFP+ Cells in the Injured Sciatic Nerve in BM Chimeric miceOur preliminary data using GFP+ BM chimeric mice showed that peripheral nerve injury induced infiltration of GFP+ BMderived cells in the ipsilateral peripheral nerve, which gradually increased between Day 3 and 14. On Day 14, the infiltration of GFP+ BM-derived cells was maximal, and approximately half of them were Iba1+ macrophages. In this study, we identified Iba1+ and GFP+ cells in the injured sciatic nerve 14 days after pSNL surgery in TRPM2BM+/Rec+, TRPM2BM?Rec+, TRPM2BM+/Rec?TRPM2 in Spinal Infiltration of Macrophage in PainFigure 3. Infiltration of GFP+ BM-derived cells around the injured sciatic nerve in WT/TRPM2-KO BM chimeric mice. (A) GFP+ cells and Iba1+ cells were visualized by GFP fluorescence (green) and immunostaining with Iba1 antibody (red), respectively, in the sciatic nerve sections around the ligation site 14 days after pSNL surgery. Iba1+/GFP+ cells were visualized as a yellow signal in merged images. Representative microphotographs are shown (scale bars = 50 mm). (B) The numbers of Iba12/GFP+ cells, Iba1+/GFP2cells, and Iba1+/GFP+ cells within the images were counted in the contralateral (left panel) and ipsilateral (right panel) sections. n = 3?. Data are expressed as the mean 6 SEM. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066410.gTRPM2BM?Rec?mice (Fig. 3, Table 1). Small numbers of Iba1+ cells and GFP+ cells were observed in the contralateral sciatic nerve in all chimeric mice. Some GFP+ cells were double positive for Iba1. No differences were observed in the number of Iba1+ cells (F3,10 = 0.22, p = 0.881) and GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.20, p = 0.896) among chimera groups. Merged images revealed no difference in the number of Iba1?GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.31, p = 0.816) or Iba1+/GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.33, p = 0.806) among chimera groups. Few Iba1+/GFP?cells were observed in any of the chimera groups, and no difference was observed among chimera groups (F3,10 = 0.35, p = 0.790). In the ipsilateral sciatic nerve, Iba1+ cells and GFP+ cells were dramatically increased, and 50?5 of GFP+ cells were positive for Iba1. Although the number of GFP+ cells tended to increase inTRPM2BM+/Rec?mice and decrease in TRPM2BM?Rec?mice, no significant differences were observed in the numbers of Iba1+ cells (F3,10 = 0.48, p = 0.706) and GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 2.93, p = 0.086) among chimera groups. Furthermore, merged photographs revealed no differences in the numbers of Iba1?GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 1.43, p = 0.292) or Iba1+/GFP+ cells (F3,10 = 0.53, p = 0.670) among chimera groups. The number of Iba1+/GFP?cells was low in all chimera groups, and no difference was observed among chimera groups (F3,10 = 2.21, p = 0.150).TRPM2 in Spinal Infiltration of Macrophage in PainTable 1. The numbers of Iba1+ and GFP+ cells around the injured sciatic nerve.Contralateral TRPM2 Total cells Iba1 cells 23977191 GFP+ cells Iba1?GFP+ cells Iba1+/GFP?cells Iba1+/GFP+ cells+ BM+/Rec+Ipsilateral TRPMBM?Rec+TRPMBM+/Rec?TRPMBM?Rec?TRPM2BM+/Rec+ TRPM2BM?Rec+ TRPM2BM+/Rec?TRPM2BM?Rec?24.7 6 7.3 18.7 6 7.3 18.7 6 4.3 6.0 6 2.0 6.0 6 3.2 12.7 6 4.1 25.0 6 0.6 15.7 6 3.7 23.3 6 1.8 9.3 6 3.7 1.7 6 1.7 14.0 6 2.0 32.0 6 4.6 17.0 6 6.1 32.0 6 4.6.