Cisions for maintaining their own good health are directly tied to one’s perceived morality and individuals must constantly monitor their adherence to health guidelines to demonstrate their moral worth as a citizen. Through these processes external forms of mass-population surveillance and regulation give way to self-surveillance. Doping and Running Despite the long history of performance enhancing substances in various sports (Mazanov and McDermott 2009), it is only since the 1960s following the televised death of a Tour de France cyclist who was engaging in doping, that doping has been identified as a problem for both sports and athletes (Waddington 2000). Since then, track and road Deslorelin chemical information runners have been at the center of doping scandals as much as athletes in other sports. The formation of the World Anti-Doping Administration (WADA) in 1999 marked the direction in which the “truth” of doping as a problem for sport and athletes was evolving (Houlihan 2003).2 Spurred by the Olympic movement, WADA was founded to both legislate and enforce anti-doping and extensive drug testing policies, and to harmonize these efforts across national- and distinct sports governing bodies (WADA 2009). WADA’s doping policy centers on its list of prohibited substances. This list is updated annually to prohibit those products and procedures that are considered to be illicit doping agents or practices (WADA 2012). Banned substances include items such as anabolic steroids, as well as some less familiar products such as diuretics. WADA differentiates between substances banned while an athlete is “in-competition”, “out of competition,” or at any time, as well as stipulating various sport-specific bans. The United States Track and Field (USATF) governs American road racing and the United States Anti-doping DuvoglustatMedChemExpress 1-Deoxynojirimycin Association (USADA) oversees this anti-doping program. The federated system of anti-doping bureaucracies provides multiple levels of testing surveillance–from the local race organizer to international bodies at World Championship events–and conducts extensive surveillance focusing mainly on elite athletes. Multiple levels of testing not only result in a larger volume of biological samples, but when coordinated can also “improve upon” the single testing method to allow longitudinal profiles of individual athletes (Zorzoli 2011). The ABP expands on some of the previous limitations of illicit drug testing by allowing agencies to compile a biological profile for each athlete that can track changes in blood markers that are suggestive of doping (WADA APB 2012). This system is meant to be more sensitive to the low-level or cyclical use of substances by repeatedly testing and monitoring athletes’ blood profiles. These biological surveillance2Established in 1999, WADA is comprised of a Foundation Board, an Executive Committee, and several sub-committees. The Foundation Board and each committee are composed of equal numbers of representatives from both the Olympic Movement and governments (WADA 2009a). The IOC created WADA for several purposes: to define what specifically the problem of doping entails; to institute regulations around doping practices and substances; and to conduct biological tests of competitors to ensure that they are in compliance with the anti-doping rules of competition (Houlihan 2003).NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSurveill Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 November 04.HenningPagesystems are inten.Cisions for maintaining their own good health are directly tied to one’s perceived morality and individuals must constantly monitor their adherence to health guidelines to demonstrate their moral worth as a citizen. Through these processes external forms of mass-population surveillance and regulation give way to self-surveillance. Doping and Running Despite the long history of performance enhancing substances in various sports (Mazanov and McDermott 2009), it is only since the 1960s following the televised death of a Tour de France cyclist who was engaging in doping, that doping has been identified as a problem for both sports and athletes (Waddington 2000). Since then, track and road runners have been at the center of doping scandals as much as athletes in other sports. The formation of the World Anti-Doping Administration (WADA) in 1999 marked the direction in which the “truth” of doping as a problem for sport and athletes was evolving (Houlihan 2003).2 Spurred by the Olympic movement, WADA was founded to both legislate and enforce anti-doping and extensive drug testing policies, and to harmonize these efforts across national- and distinct sports governing bodies (WADA 2009). WADA’s doping policy centers on its list of prohibited substances. This list is updated annually to prohibit those products and procedures that are considered to be illicit doping agents or practices (WADA 2012). Banned substances include items such as anabolic steroids, as well as some less familiar products such as diuretics. WADA differentiates between substances banned while an athlete is “in-competition”, “out of competition,” or at any time, as well as stipulating various sport-specific bans. The United States Track and Field (USATF) governs American road racing and the United States Anti-doping Association (USADA) oversees this anti-doping program. The federated system of anti-doping bureaucracies provides multiple levels of testing surveillance–from the local race organizer to international bodies at World Championship events–and conducts extensive surveillance focusing mainly on elite athletes. Multiple levels of testing not only result in a larger volume of biological samples, but when coordinated can also “improve upon” the single testing method to allow longitudinal profiles of individual athletes (Zorzoli 2011). The ABP expands on some of the previous limitations of illicit drug testing by allowing agencies to compile a biological profile for each athlete that can track changes in blood markers that are suggestive of doping (WADA APB 2012). This system is meant to be more sensitive to the low-level or cyclical use of substances by repeatedly testing and monitoring athletes’ blood profiles. These biological surveillance2Established in 1999, WADA is comprised of a Foundation Board, an Executive Committee, and several sub-committees. The Foundation Board and each committee are composed of equal numbers of representatives from both the Olympic Movement and governments (WADA 2009a). The IOC created WADA for several purposes: to define what specifically the problem of doping entails; to institute regulations around doping practices and substances; and to conduct biological tests of competitors to ensure that they are in compliance with the anti-doping rules of competition (Houlihan 2003).NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSurveill Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 November 04.HenningPagesystems are inten.